Wanda Warren Berry writes:

> Some comments on "subjectivity" have seemed take
> SK's meaning much too romantically or mystically
> to fit with what I think he means.

I understand that this is a real problem. There is,
however, a simple solution, which was suggested to me
when I looked up the meaning of the word "subject" in
Rudolf Eisler's  Woerterbuch der Philosophie.

Eisler describes the original meaning of the terms "subject"
and "subjective" as follows:

"Dieser aeltere Subjektbegriff ist der des substantiellen Traegers
objektiver Eigenschaften, des objektiven Wirklichen im Unterschiede
vom blosz vorgestellten "objectum" (s.d.) "Subjektum"  ist die 
Uebersetzung des hypokeimenon (Unterliegenden) worunter Aristoteles
sowohl das logische Subjekt als auch die Substanz als
Eigenschaftstraeger versteht."
Eisler, Rudolf, Woerterbuch der Philosophie 1930, Vol 3, p. 165

Consequently we may, on Aristotle's authority, replace not only
in the Concluding Unscientific Postscript but also in all of 
Kierkegaard's other writings, the syllable "sub" with the syllable
"ob", everywhere substituting "objective" for "subjective." We
may then read "Objectivity is truth", which is what we really
believe anyway, not to mention the fact that it's the right answer
on the SAT, which we have to give if we want to get into college.
The proposed emendation will make Kierkegaard's writings much
easier to understand, will bring about objective and subjective
improvement in the digestion of each of us, will alleviate any
insomnia induced by reading Kierkegaard, and most important, will
greatly enhance the sale of Kierkegaard's works, by making them
required reading for courses in military and industrial psychology,
human resources, public relations and advertising.

                                         Ernst Meyer