Therese Foote writes: > So active faithfulness, doing God's will, > will lead to knowledge and the epistemic belief that > follows upon it. But to demand that one have such > belief before one has even entered into the relationship > with God! That is to stand Christianity on its head. A few paragraphs later, she writes referring to the dilemma of a woman seeking God: > But Christianity tells her: You cannot come > to God unless you already believe. I resolve the apparent contradictions of the two allusions to Christianity, in that the first refers to Christianity as Therese Foote believes it should be; the second to Christianity as it is. I have no problem with Therese Foote, or Kevin Solway, or for that matter, any other correspondent with our list redefining Christianity, God, Faith, Belief, Truth, or any of the other difficult concepts that are our stock in trade. The attempts of each one of us to set forth his own views and the subsequent attempts of the rest of us to understand these views seem to me the most valuable of pedagogic exercises. At the same time, to the extent that issues of religion are subjective matters, we should not be surprised, much less chagrined, when we find ourselves in irreconcilable disagreement. The canonical Protestant resolution to the paradox of faith (not mine) is explicitly set forth in Articles 4 and 5 of the Augsburg Confession. (I cite a bowdlerized modern text, the only one I have at hand.) 4. Von der Rechtfertigung Weiter wird gelehrt, dasz wir Vergebung der Suende und Gerechtigkeit vor Gott nicht durch unser Verdienst, Werk und Genugtun erlangen koennen, sondern dasz wir Vergebung der Suende bekommen und vor Gott gerecht werden aus Gnaden, um Christi willen, durch den Glauben, wenn wir glauben, dasz Christus fuer uns gelitten hat, und dasz uns um seinetwillen die Suende vergeben und Gerechtigkeit und ewiges Leben geschenkt wird. Denn diesen Glauben will Gott fuer "Gerechtigkeit vor ihm" halten und uns zurechnen, wie St. Paulus im Brief an die Roemer Kap. 3 und 4 sagt. (4. Concerning justification Further it is taught, that we cannot attain forgiveness of sins and justification before God through our own deserving, works, or satisfaction but that we receive forgiveness of sins and are justified before God by grace, for Christ's sake, through faith, when we believe that Christ suffered for us and that for his sake the sin is forgiven us and justification and eternal life are given us. For God will deem this faith as "justification before him", as St. Paul says in chapters 3 and 4 of the letter to the Romans.) 5. Vom Predigtamt Damit wir solchen Glauben erlangen, hat Gott das Predigtamt eingesetzt und das Evangelium und die Sakramente gegeben. Durch diese Mittel gibt er den Heiligen Geist, welcher den Glauben wo und wann er will, in denen wirkt, die das Evangelium hoeren. Dieses lehrt, dasz wir durch Christi Verdienst, nicht durch unser Verdienst, einen gnaedigen Gott haben, wenn wir solches glauben. Es werden verworfen die Wiedertaeufer und andere, die lehren, dasz wir den Heiligen Geist ohne das leibliche Wort des Evangeliums durch eigene Bereitung, Gedanken und Werke erlangen. 5. Concerning the ministry In order that we might attain to such faith, God has instituted the ministry and given the Gospel and the Sacraments. Through these means he gives the Holy Spirit, which brings about faith when and where he wills, in those who hear the Gospel. This shows that, when we believe this, we have a merciful God through Christ's deserving, not through our deserving. The Anabaptists and others who teach that we may obtain the Holy Spirit without the physical word of the Gospel, through our own preparation, thoughts and works, are condemned. The resolution which Therese Foote suggests, reminds me of the deism espoused by authors such as Lessing in the latter half of the 18th century. Given the enthusiasm with which Kierkegaard praised Lessing in the Concluding Unscientific Postscript, I wonder what Kierkegaard thought about Lessing's para-theological writings, such as his correspondence with Hauptpastor Goetze in Hamburg, or his drama, Nathan der Weise. Does anyone have any hints? It is difficult for me to imagine that Deism's easy way out of the paradox of faith would have been acceptable to Kierkegaard. Another solution to the paradox of faith is even easier. "Dieu me pardonnera; c'est son devoir." Heinrich Heine is quoted to have said. Ernst Meyer review@netcom.com