I also haven't had a chance to re-read Kierkegaard's book on Adler, but I am too fascinated by Kevin Solway's excursions on "genius" to defer my comments. "Genius" is a word with a long and complex philological background; Grimm's "Woerterbuch der deutschen Sprache" devotes the equivalent of 104 pages (about 41600 words) to the philological history of the term "genius" in European languages. Beginning at least with Socrates' account of his "daimon", philosophers have tried to present their inward, subjective experiences as objective phenomena, of which they purport to be able to give an accounting to their fellow human beings. The subjective is denominated "genius" or "daimon" with respect to the individual; with respect to the cosmos we call it "God". Giving it a name, conceptualizing the subjective, however, bestows on it only virtual, not actual objectivity. Each one of us is closest to himself. "Ein jeder liebt sich selbst am meisten," as Lessing said. Hence each one of us deems himself aware of the spirit within him, deems himself a "genius", though not all of us have the courage (or the impudence) so to proclaim ourselves. "Genius is extremely rare," is a euphemism by means of which I assert my uniqueness. What it really means is that the only genius of my experience is myself. I can be convinced of someone elses genius no more than I can be convinced of someone elses God. What circumstance could be more natural? what admission, more truthful? Given the egocentricity of spirit, our relationships to others become problematic. The hypothesis of a common deity is the bond that unites us with all other human beings. That, in my book, is the essence of ecclesiology. Paradoxically, we conceive of deity as being both subjective and objective; as being within us, and yet being the same for all men and women. In uttermost isolation and loneliness I proclaim: "Credo in unum deum." I believe in _one_ God for all men and for all creation. I live at the center of my own universe, and I survive on the paradoxical assumption that my universe is identical with that of others. Or I survive on the obviously unrealistic assumption that I am the only one, or at any rate that genius is extremely rare. Or I survive by learning to love. Goethe's dictum is equally applicable to ones relationship to his fellow men and to his God: "Gegen die groszen Vorzuege eines anderen, gibt es kein Rettungsmittel als die Liebe." (Against the great virtues of others, there is no defense but love.) Ernst Meyer