Dear Cyndy, Just an hour or two ago, when Nathaniel came into the kitchen to get the keys for the car, he told Margaret in passing that he had accepted Yale's offer. It makes me sad, but I expect only transiently. For me it's the same old story: I care more for him than he for me. The imbalance of affection is a pathetic infirmity of mine which has afflicted me all my life. Periodically I think I've outgrown it, but then the injury recurs, made more tolerable now by the circumstance that it nourishes my fiction. Kimberly's response to my overture was a certified mailing containing her opposition to my motion to strike, and a request to the Court to assess me with attorney's fees and court costs for what she, in desperation I believe, calls a frivolous filing. Wisely or otherwise I had withheld from my motion some procedural specifics, because I didn't want to function as her law professor, and inadvertently instruct her in the strategy least likely to fail. So far as I can tell from her filing, it's all sound and fury; she still doesn't understand the procedural niceties. I doubt she'll get a sympathetic hearing, but one can never predict. Judges are human too, sometimes very human. Her over-reaction will focus the Court's attention on the issue, and my explanation of why I should not be fined will give me a chance to argue more vigorously that her opposition should be stricken and that the case is over. The hearing, as I mentioned, is scheduled for May 12. Today I assembled all the papers that need to be filed. I'm waiting ten days, until April 24, for Mr. Hadas' the AG's opposition to my motion to strike, - an opposition that seems very unlikely. I've had no opposition from him to my Judgment on the Pleadings motion: it's now 38 days since I served it on him. However, it's good to be prepared for all contingencies: maybe the mailman delivered it to someone else, just as, in the past two days, he's mistakenly deposited 5 letters for our neighbors in our mail box. Life never ceases to be interesting. Whatever happened to our land in NH? - It's still there, eating very modest annual real estate taxes. Margaret and I haven't been to visit it for six or seven years, - the last time being when I drove off the shoulder because I couldn't see the edge of the road through the high grass. It was a choice of getting the road rebuilt with truckloads of gravel, or getting a four-wheel drive truck or van of some sort, - neither of which seemed economically rational. Nowadays it would be difficult for me to hike up our hill, and impossible for Margaret. I'm satisfied with the knowledge that the land is there, even if we can't visit. The "retirement" issue which you raise is, of course, very important for all of us. Margaret and I intend to stay here in this house until the bitter end, which, for my part, I very much hope will come sooner rather than later. A few weeks ago, I discussed the issue with Klemens and reminded him that in order to preserve family capital, he'd better help us stay here rather than go off to rot and die in a nursing or retirement home. He is determined when the time comes to hire household help to assist us as needed, a scheme that worked very well for my parents: under the arrangements we made, their capital actually increased during their final illnesses. I marvel at the complexity of human relationships: we live here in this very large house with so much unused space; and all around us are persons in need of places to stay. Yet the difficulties of mutual accommodation are so great that each of us needs his or her separateness. Proximity unavoidably tends to generate conflict and hostility. And ultimately each of us is very much alone. Over the years, I have observed my relationships to my patients, how few are truly lasting, how many of them wither and fade, with as great necessity as plants that shed their leaves in autumn. That, I admit, is not a proper message for the spring. But I find myself in an autumnal mood tonight. It's better I should stop and wish you and Ned good night; and write again sooner rather than later, when the sun has risen once more. Jochen