Whether inwardness is multiple or diverse. Whether it
is as it were, a house with many mansions, or whether
it is unitary and single. If subjectivity is divine,
is there in subjectivity rooms also for matters not
divine? Or is everything that is subjective also divine
by virtue of its subjectivity? and if so, does not this
inclusiveness destroy or dissolve the meaning of the divine?

The term subjectivity or inwardness is awkward enough.
It is a mistake to consider subjectivity as a consistent
continuing function of the mind.
Like consciousness it fluctuates.
Sometimes it comes to the foreground in an awareness 
of great stress and urgency;
but much of the time it is in abeyance,
and (far) below the threshold of awareness.
Indeed many  minds are not aware of it,
and do not recognize it at all.
Surely many if not most subjective experience
does not display the emblem of divinity.
But the potentiality of divineness is always present.

With respect to the assessment of subjectivity
there are two options. One may consider subjectivity
composite of intuitions (Erleben)
some of which is extraordinary and divine,
but some of which is also ordinary and very secular.
With this option one would not only be confronted with
the task of deciding which was which,
but one would also have to account for the cohabitation
of the divine and the secular in a single abode.

If on first thought, the alternative, that everything inward,
that all subjectivity is divine, seems at first thought
incongruous and preposterous, this is the case because
we approach the issue with the preconception that God
is unconditionally and absolutely good, - and that this
virtue, this goodness is outside the realm and range
of subjectivity.