Dear Marion, Michael Joseph Donovan, the Clerk of the Civil Division of the Suffolk Superior Court is dragging his feet about assembling the records of Meyer v. Nantucket Building Department et al., SUCV2008-05664, - and until he does so the Appeal won't be docketed and the fifty days allotted to me for filing my Brief and Record Appendix will not have started to run. That was my excuse for taking the time to sneak a look at the rather lengthy essay about Charles Darwin in Wikipedia, and although I haven't begun to learn all I need to know, I can't resist the impulse to write down the thoughts that come to mind, and I suppose until you stop telling me that you enjoy reading e-mail from me, I'll keep sending you my ruminations, no matter how raw, half-baked, or overdone they may turn out to be. The essay confirmed what I thought I had remembered about the origin of The Origin of Species and natural selection: "Continuing his research in London, Darwin's wide reading now included the sixth edition of Malthus's An Essay on the Principle of Population "In October 1838, that is, fifteen months after I had begun my systematic enquiry, I happened to read for amusement Malthus on Population, and being well prepared to appreciate the struggle for existence which everywhere goes on from long-continued observation of the habits of animals and plants, it at once struck me that under these circumstances favourable variations would tend to be preserved, and unfavourable ones to be destroyed. The result of this would be the formation of new species. Here, then, I had at last got a theory by which to work..."" Perhaps then, my surmise that underlying Darwin's theory was reflection and concern with human affairs, was not too far off the mark; and once in human territory, the first person singular, it seems to me, becomes inescapable. I was impressed also by the contrast of Darwin with Kierkegaard, (who was 4 years his junior), and for that matter with Spinoza, in that Kierkegaard's and Spinoza's thought was nurtured in seclusion and isolation, whereas Darwin, judging at least from the Wikipedia essay, was intellectually very gregarious, and the success of his ideas was very much a consequence of their immediate acceptance by a critical mass of his contemporaries, in contrast to Spinoza and Kierkegaard the significance of whose thought was discovered only after their deaths. I have the impression that from its very inception, Darwinism was very much a public, if not indeed a popular movement, with some of the social, literary and intellectual qualities of journalism; a fact which seems to corroborate my hypothesis that "objective" thought is inherently public and social, as opposed to the separateness and seclusion of "subjective" ideas. Although Darwin himself may have skirted the theological implications of his theories, reading between the lines of the Wikipedia essay, I get the impression that these theories were carried to the acme of influence on a wave of religious revisionism. In the second half of the 19th century, I think, traditional religion was being widely superseded by beliefs in science. If contemporary historians credit Darwin with the paternity of modern biology, they do so, if I understand correctly, not because of the uniqueness of his contributions, but because the public celebrated - and still celebrates him - as a latter day Martin Luther who stands at the threshold of modern secular thought. The persistence of the Evolution vs Creationism controversy into our own day, would seem to strengthen that hypothesis. Klemens came over last night to look at some of his grandparents' transatlantic correspondence. He proposes to digitize it, and to try to manipulate the graphic images to enhance the very poor contrast which makes them legible only with difficulty. While glancing at various of the letters, I found one which touched me in particular. It was from my father, addressed to my mother, dated December 25, 1938, and described your parents' care and concern and affection for him at Christmas time. Under the tree, he found a notebook diary for 1939, a book in English about an immigrant physician, and 200 cigarettes, and Georg, when they all visited there later that day, made him a gift of another two hundred. Then another wave of embarrassment for my parents' inability to acknowledge and reciprocate your parents' efforts swept over me. And now back to my legal composition. Jochen