Various issues will be clarified, and some disagreements will be resolved on closer scrutiny of the nature and quality of our awareness. The distinction between the unconsciousness of sleep and, for example, the critical awareness of threading a needle are familiar enough. But there are many levels of mental activity. "You are not paying attention (to me)," is a most familiar complaint. The imagination of the child who has not learned to distinguish fantasy from reality is most easily distracted and exploited. Even for the mature mind, the distinction between what is imagined and what is real remains problematic: if only because everything that is real, in order to be perceived, requires also to be imagined; furthermore, the products of the imagination have a reality which in some respects is indistinguishable from the reality that is perceived prior to the exercise of the imagination. To phrase it differently: the perception of reality is attended by imagination that differs from occasion to occasion and from person to person in degree and in quality. For the uncritical imagination the "alien" from outer space is as real as is the fireman from Waltham or Arlington. For the uncritical imagination, the dinosaurs of 200 million years ago are as real as the deer that I see grazing under the apple trees of the lawn fifty feet from the porch on which I sit. For the uncritical imagination, the Greek soldiers who fought and died at Thermopylae are as real as my patient who happens to die of a stroke or a heart attack in my office. For me, that which I see or hear is more compelling by far than that which I imagine. History is essentially imagination; that is why the historical event is not as real to me as the event which is present to my eyes or ears. The "reality" attributable to the inferences of archeology, paleontology, evolutionary biology, cosmology and geology are unavoidably contingent on imagination. All of these are historical disciplines. What they tell me is less real than what I glean from nature with my own perception. Evolutionary biology is history, and as such is Geisteswissenschaft and is under the same constraints as govern all other history. And not only evolutionary biology, - geology, cosmology, paleontology, archeology are all of them historical disciplines, and are all under the same constraints. My surmise was corroborated by an article that I found when in an attempt to enlighten myself about paleontology, I was surfing the Internet: O'Hara, Robert J. "Homage to Clio, or Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology" Syst. Zoology 37(2):142-155, 1988