Dear Georgette, Thank you for your letter, and especially for your descriptions of the dreams in which Margrit appeared. Following our long telephone conversation, I thought frequently about your immediate problem - the defamation that so troubled you, I thought also about your relationship to Margrit and I asked myself how your life and your parents' was affected by my sister. I understand well enough that such queries have no answers, and given how few the "facts" of which I have knowledge, I am not sure I am even qualified to ask the question. If I haven't made specific requests for details, that's because I understand the recapitulation of the past to be a potential source of more unhappiness. Nonetheless, I ask you to consider writing about your experiences with Margrit, not as fiction, but a blend of biography and autobiography. If you wrote such a book, you would have at least one interested reader. The composition might also prove rewarding to you in itself. I'm sorry that Helmut's reaction to Anschluss was a disappointment. I'm not surprised. I've probably recounted to you that when he read my first novel many years ago, Helmut was very critical. I have never asked him to read anything else that I have written, and to my knowledge he hasn't looked at any of the texts I've published on the Internet. I can have no opinion about the validity of his editorial judgment. Subjectively, obviously, our literary preferences diverge. Nonetheless we consider each other the best of friends. I like Helmut very much. I'm sorry for him, but not for myself, that he doesn't believe my work to be suitable for publication. It may be the acme of sour grapes self-deception, that I consider success in the literary marketplace a political phenomenon. I seek publication of my own writing no more than I run for public office. It may seem facetious even to mention that I would accept a position in public life where I could exercise my intelligence and my judgment "for the public good". But I will not ask for such an office, I will not run for election, and I will certainly not alter any opinion or judgment to curry favor with an individual or with the public. Similarly, I won't try to change the style or the content of my writing to obtain the endorsement of a publisher. If publication were important to me, I would try to secure it on my own. Publishing my books, becoming "famous" would turn into another do-it-yourself project. I would be in good company. Various authors who subsequently became prominent began by promoting themselves. Most such attempts of course are failures, and I have no reason to assume that mine would be successful. However I wouldn't mind trying. It's in consequence of my priorities, that I don't promote my own writing. My days are numbered. Publication wouldn't transform a mediocre product into a masterpiece. I prefer to spend myself in attempts to write texts that are worthwhile, rather than to secure public endorsement of the admittedly imperfect pages already written, - with which I am never fully satisfied. Please interpret these sentences as a confession of what I've been up to; by no means a prescription. Nothing is further from my intention than asking you to accept for yourself my own relationship to literature. Given the fervor with which my sister tried to insinuate herself into your father's life and into yours, I believe that some manner of communication between us is inescapable, even if that communication turns out to be inapparent, - in Rilke's words: Die ununterbrochene Nachricht, die aus Stille sich bildet. Jochen