Dear Marion, When I awoke this morning, an approach to the definition of Kultur was clear in my mind, or so it seemed. Various practical tasks to be completed in the 72 hours before our departure seemed to require my attention. Only some of this morning's inspiration survived a day of trimming grass around the foundations of the house, and partially dismembering a 75 feet tall dead locust tree that had unexpectedly collapsed onto the western lawn. Fortunately the house was spared, but a beautiful small dogwood tree, - I doubt that you find those in Minnesota or Wisconsin, - was crushed. Ten years ago or so, the dogwood had been fractured by an ice storm. At the time I projected my professional expertise to tree surgery, securing to each other two badly broken limbs by means of a 3/8" threaded metal rod. Today I also cleared from the gutter on the south side of the house a cluster of twigs and branches presumably blown there by last winter's tornado. None of these efforts had much bearing on the meaning of Kultur. Later, as I began to consider what the word Kultur might mean, I was reminded of one of Plato's dialogues, the "Sophist", I believe, which wrestles with the awkward consequences of the reification of concepts. All I remember after sixty years is the presumption that the names with which Plato designated his various ideals must, if they were to be compelling, possess the reality of objects, an hypothesis which leads to impossible logical and verbal predicaments. In this instance, as so often, it's not the answer which is meaningful, but the question.... At this point, I fell asleep. - Meanwhile another day has dawned. My problem, what did my parents mean by "Kultur", becomes tractable as soon as I postulate that Kultur is not an entity, but a function; as soon as I begin to understand that Kultur is a reference to the perspective in which my parents' world became meaningful for them. It is the projection onto their social and historical environment of values and qualities that they deemed important, if not indeed essential for their lives. Cultural values are analogous to religious values, and similarly opaque to definition. Kultur is a meaningful concept only in the context of the esthetic and ethical experience and expectations of the individual who entertains it. Far from being an entity, Kultur is a quality of emotional and intellectual (spiritual) existence as varied, changeable and multifarious as is the population of our world. Kultur is a concept that makes explicit the reciprocal interaction between the individual and his (spiritual) environment. It defines their interdependence. One infers Kultur from the burgeoning of art, music, literature and philosophy. One postulates Greek culture in the days of Homer, Aeschylus Sophocles, Euripides, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, a culture of ancient Rome and of the Italian Renaissance, English culture at the time of Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare and Marlowe, as well as German culture exemplified by Lessing, Schiller, Goethe, Kleist, Heine, not to speak of Bach, Haendel, Telemann, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, Schumann, Mendelssohn ... If my learning did not fail me, I would go on. The concept "Deutsche Kultur" to the best of my very limited knowledge was an invention of Romantic historical consciousness. The circumstance that it was coopted by the rampant nationalism of the late nineteenth and early 20th century does not impair the validity of the concept and does not justify its becoming a target of bigoted contempt. It was the Greeks who coined the word "barbarian". The French and the English have nationalisms of their own, and when in glass houses, one shouldn't throw stones. I'll try to send you an e-mail when we arrive in Belmont. If it doesn't reach you before your departure, I'll see you at the airport. Jochen