12/06/2010 	#17 	Decision: Full Opinion (Vuono, J.)
So much of the judgment as affirms the board's decision
to uphold the inspector's order requiring Meyer to cease
all plumbing work is affirmed.
So much of the judgment as affirms the board's decision
to uphold the order requiring Meyer
to remove the uninspected plumbing is reversed.
The matter is remanded for further proceedings
consistent with the opinion of the Appeals Court. Notice.

Details of the court's opinion came in the mail this morning.
It addresses only my contentions:
1) that do-it-yourself plumbing is not illegal, which
contention is denied, and
2) that Nantucket has no legal right to order the 
destruction of my plumbing, 
which contention is sustained.
The court states that there is no need to address
the other contentions which I make.
The circumstance that there is on the face of the record
no evidence that the Court informed Nantucket of its decision,
suggests that the court accepted my procedural argument
that Nantucket not having intervened,
had never become a party to the action.
The court states explicitly that Nantucket may not now
give me or the plumber whom I hire a hard time,
and that any adverse decision by the plumbing inspector
is subject to review by the Superior Court and by the Appeals Court.