Dear Marion, Thank you for your letter which corroborates my comment of last December 22, "As usual, you hit the nail on the head, but sometimes with a glancing blow that bends it slightly out of shape." You are eminently correct to contrast "Georgette's no-nonsense-yet-humane letter" with my disconcerting reply which has left you wondering what I was thinking of when I wrote: "Margrit, as you know, had thought it necessary to reject the family into which she was born in order to establish a family of her own. You know at first hand the extent to which her efforts were unsuccessful. She neither found the family she sought, nor escaped the family of which she was both victim and beneficiary. As a result, her life transpired in an existential limbo." You may stop wondering. My thoughts, however faulty and foolish, were exhaustively subsumed in my words. You ask: "What made Margrit think that rejecting her own family would be conducive to creating her own family? Was there anything to this? Did the Meyers create obstacles to Margrit's relationship with Izzie? I would seriously doubt it, and never heard anything from Margrit suggesting that this was the case. Or have I forgotten something?" Forgotten or perhaps misunderstood. Both my parents and I were uncompromisingly critical of Margrit's adulterous relationship with her first lover, her college theology professor Edward Case in whose household she had served as a caretaken of the children. I remember vividly warning her that if she married Professor Case, he would betray her as he had betrayed his first wife. Ten years later, when Margrit's relationship with Isidore Fleischer became acute, I had recognized the error of my critical stance and deliberately refrained from all derogatory comments. Not so my parents who were overtly contemptuous of Izzy who sported a Hippie appearance, was the father of a mistreated illegitimate child, and explicitly rejected the responsibilities of marriage. That Margrit should have concealed from you the nature and the degree of her alienation from her family, is not surprising. Particularly after my parents' deaths Margrit became progressively ambivalent about her relationships to them and overtly prided herself on possessing "the Meyer genes". Like our mother, Margrit was an actress whose life was largely determined by the script that she improvised for herself. Especially as she recognized in you a beneficiary, like her, of "the Meyer genes" it's not surprising that in her reports to you, Margrit understated her conflicts with her parents and her brother. I have discovered correspondence with Georgette comprising more than fifty letters. These were exchanged only a year ago, and it is symptomatic of my aging mind that I should already have forgotten. Meanwhile, these reminiscences of Margrit's relations to the Fleischers have distracted me from Buechner's Woyzeck, which I had intended to reread. Woyzeck might become the topic of a subsequent letter. Jochen