1. I have submitted in three memoranda, the issues which
I believe require adjudication.

2. There is before the Court an unopposed motion, which if
granted would reconcile the peculiarities of municipal
administration on Nantucket with the ruling of the Appeals
Court and with the effective adminstrative procedures which
prevail everywhere else in the Commonwealth.

3. The issue is not only the integrity of the plumbing that
I have installed. The issue is also the administrative
integrity of the Town of Nantucket, which has relied for
years, and continues now to rely on the fabrication of
evidence, on the forgery of an official document, and on
the falsification of Town records, and which presently
relies also on the intimidation of witnesses and on the
existence of an illegal boycott, in consequence of which
I have been prevented from completing my house.

4. If the Court requires more evidence, I request the
opportunity to provide that evidence by discovery. Both the
integrity of my plumbing and the integrity of Nantucket
administrative procedures are subject to such further
scrutiny as the Court deems necessary.  I acknowledge that
relevance may become an issue, and I should welcome a
preliminary ruling as to hypothetical irrelevance.

5. Even if this case is never reported, the Court's decision
will have immediate consequences in many jurisdictions of the
Commonwealth because Mr. Pucci represents not only Nantucket
but 119 other municipalities whom he will advise concerning
their responsibilities. Unavoidably, what happens today on 
Nantucket will happen tomorrow all over the state.