NOT SENT
                    ========

Dear Mr. Pucci,

Attached is a copy of my e-mail to you of April 6, 2012.
One of my predictions has come true. I don't know why 
Mr. Ciarmataro is no longer employed by the Town of Nantucket,
but I interpret Footnote #7 in the 2013-P-1536 decision as
a threat to Mr. Ciarmataro's plumbing license if he fails 
to appear at the Hearing and if the competent evidence in 
the record is interpreted, as I believe it will be, to show 
that Mr. Ciarmataro's Inspection Report and Condemnation Order 
was and is, false and fraudulent. The Board of State Examiners
of Plumbers and Gas Fitters has given no indication that
it would on its own initiative revoke Mr. Ciarmataro's
plumbing license, but if ordered by the Appeals Court,
it would have no choice but to do so. 

Inasmuch as I will appeal any adverse decision, and inasmuch
as I believe the record on which I would appeal may be 
interpreted as evidence of a criminal conspiracy to obstruct 
justice on the part of Messrs. Ciarmataro, Ramos and Butler,
I believe that by their endorsement of the Inspection Report
and Condemnation Order in sworn testimony before the Board,
Mr. Ramos and Mr. Butler are placing their professional licenses 
at risk.

I do not want any of the three, Messrs. Ciarmataro, Ramos or
Butler to suffer professional injury in consequence of this
litigation. If in your professional judgment, you find my
concerns to be valid, please do your utmost to protect these
three gentlemen from their lack of legal skills, and please 
always remember that even though the process of litigating is
not burdensome to me, I'm always prepared to be generous and 
to compromise.

Sincerely yours,
Ernst J. Meyer

=============================================

re: Meyer v. Nantucket Building Dept.
    SUCV 2008-05664

Dear Mr. Pucci,

As I contemplate another hearing before the Board of State
Examiners of Plumbers and Gasfitters in the above-captioned case,
I am concerned about the risk for Mr. Ciarmataro, of whom as
you may infer from our prior correspondence, I am quite fond,
and whom I wish very much not to hurt. Please review carefully
the memoranda I have recently filed, and consider the possible
consequences for Mr. Ciarmataro's employment and even for his
plumber's license when these memoranda are emphatically 
brought to the attention of the Board. Government agencies
such as the Board of State Examiners of Plumbers and Gas Fitters
maintain their legitimacy by making scapegoats of individuals 
whose awkwardness illuminates the impracticality and irrationality
of their regulatory efforts.

If in your professional judgment, you find my concerns to be
valid, please do your utmost to protect Mr. Ciarmataro from
himself, and please always remember that even though I derive
much satisfaction from the process of litigating, I'm always
prepared to be generous and to compromise.

Sincerely,
Ernst Meyer