20160914.00
Argument:
1. What the court meant: specific 
2. What the court meant: hearing; competent evidence;inkblots
3. FTC vs NC Board Dental Examiners/ interposition

subsidiary topics
  the truthfulness of the chairman
  judicial notice
  compromise
  who is an expert
  engineering plumbing
  the systematic intimidation of witnesses
  witnesses as fools, 
  plumbing as legalized extortion
  the economic-financial dimensions of the controversy
  the non-existence of the plumbing code.
  plumbing fees as taxes 

To interpret this order one must look at
the record that was before the Appeals Court.
The order of the appeals court serves to confirm
that the inspection report was a fiction.

The burden of the appeals court order was to 
require the parties to provide information
to make it possible to bring the system to code 
compliance without destroying it. This the Board
could not do because the Inspection Report
was a fiction and because as applied to Meyer 
the code itself was a fiction.

An unrebuttable presumption of judicial integrity.

If Mr. Ramos had testified to a dream, 
to hallicunations,
to Alice in Wonderland syndrome, Justice Giles would
have been required to take judicial notice 

A murder of language, verbicide, in open Court.

Ostracise, ostracism
calling Gordon a fool
was ostracising him.
He was shamed,embarrassed, ostracised

Public service
unlike advocates for civil rights or environment 
who perform what they conceive as their civic duty by
violating the law, for example by occupying public spaces
my advocacy is by strictly legal means.

the boycott by the plumbers is a form of ostracism

my own witness, Mr. Gordon suspected me
volunteering the testimony that he could not
swear that I had installed the plumbing
the devil did it.
"Bill, you can't just call someone a liar."

For me, experiencing the vicissitudes of existence
discovering the truth.

I think I am doing a public service by demonstrating
discovering exhibiting the nature of adjudication
If you think what I'm doing is harmful, tell me and 
I'll stop.

The inspection, the inspection report, the hearings
are FICTIONS. Our political life is a fiction.

Court of oyer and terminer.
Set aside the rules of procedure when convenient
the rule of cumulative evidence can't be invoked
to support an adverse ruling.

deposition testimony from members of the Board

ostracised from the fraternity of plumbers

The Board interpreted the Photos of as projective test.

The decision of this Court will be a chapter in an account
of how the Massachusetts Appeals Court deals with a
series of interrelated fictions invented by the government.

If I went to Nantucket to obtain depositions, there is a rational
risk that I would be arrested by the police on fabricated charges

How does society protect itself against a serious mental disorder.
The facts alleged in the Boards Final Decision are so remote from
reality, that one must ask whether their author is afflicted with
absolute cynicism and contempt for the court or with a mental
condition such as the Alice in Wonderland syndrome.
In at least one foreign jurisdiction which has had extraordinary
experience with aberrations of the legal system, this issue is
confronted directly by holding judicial officers responsible
for subversion of due process. Here there is an unrebuttable
presumption concerning the moral and mental integrity of judicial
officers, so that there is an open problem.