d161030.00ack
1) The issue is the Court's order for the accounting
of "specific violations that are noted in the Inspection Report
and substantiated by photos." 

2) At the Hearing there is no citation of anything in the report.
No violations noted. The Report (and the Code) were dismissed 
by Mr. Ramos as paperwork. Therefore there is no case.

3) The Appeals Court did not order a projective Rorschach test.

4) The only competent testimony at the Hearing was from Mr. Gordon.

5) The Board ignored the competent testimony at the Hearing, but
relied on its own private secret interpretation of the photos.

6) That interpretation which was not subject for rebuttal because
it was not disclosed until 5 1/2 months after the Hearing is
spectral evidence, as of a fantasy or a dream.

7) Because Gordon's testimony was the only competent evidence at the
Hearing it is the standard against which the Inspection Report must
be judged. 

8) The reason for this appeal is the Superior Courts failure to take
judicial notice a) of the appeals court decision, b) of the 30A,
c) of the unreality of the Boards assertions.

9) Unreality, anomie, Pitch, full S-trap, defective solder joint, 
misidentified locations

Despotic, Ramos, Cirmataro, Butler (Stephen) Bayer, Pucci.
and structures.

Compromise? Must be kidding, Mr. Ramos the plumbing judge,
while practicing plumbing, trying cases of his competitors
in which he has an interest, testifying before himself,
trying a case in which his friends have an interest.