This morning, the dog situation seems more manageable to me.

a) I have no intention of moving to Konnarock.

b) I make no objection to the dog's leaving.

c) I make no objection to Nathaniel's leaving.

c) There is no evidence that the dog has jumped the indoor fence.
There is no evidence that he is able to do so at the present time. 
This morning he is standing placidly in his cage, wagging his tail. 
He has not barked.

d) The proposal of the dog's hypothetical ability, present or future,
to jump over the indoor fence is not a reasonable argument to compel
the construction of an outdoor fence.

f) If and when there is evidence that the existing cage no longer serves
to contain the dog, the choices are:

f-1) to extend the walls upward so that he can no longer jump them.
f-2) to cover the cage at its existing height with wire mesh.
f-3) to move the dog back to the second floor bedroom at the northwest
corner of the existing house
f-4) to secure for the dog a space in the basement of the existing house
from which he cannot escape.
f-5) to have the dog leave.

g) If and when it becomes certain that the dog will not urinate or defecate
at random, and that the dog will not chew furniture, electrical cords or
carpets, it is reasonable then to permit him to roam the house for limited
periods of time, provided one of the options of f-1) to f-4) above remains 
implemented.

h) I have no objection to exploring options for establishing for the dog
an outside area fenced by means of electrical or mechanical devices, provided
that until I have explicitly consented:
h-1) no money be spent and
h-2) no other measures be taken 
to implement such a plan.