20050621.01 Transcendentalism as theology As philosophy, American transcendententalism is implausible. At least since Descartes, the primary concern of philosophy has been epistemological, the quest for answers to questions such as: What is knowledge, what do I know, what can I know, "Wie ist Wissenschaft moeglich," (Kant), how is science possible. To the transcendentalists, these questions were of no interest. Transcendentalism was a revolt within the established Unitarian Church. Strictly speaking, it was not reformation, but counter-reformation. With the help of John Locke, those vestiges of the divine which the Scholastics had purported to find in the soul as innate ideas had been erased by a prior generation as it asserted itself against Puritanism and Congregationalism. Its rhetoric was now no longer compelling. A new generation of Divines, discomfited with the barrenness of the Lockean soul, demanded its own voice, demanded that its own values, its sensitivities, its passions, be acknowledged by the church. It was an ecclesiastical counter-revolution, but because the stakes were not high, the results were not spectacular, and it proved of little import. Transcendentalism tried to find its focus by replacing the tabula rasa epistemology of Locke with Kant's "Anschauung", (intuition). Locke had undertaken to erase the purportedly divine lettering which the Scholastics identified in the human soul; he presumed to wipe it away like graffitti, leaving the soul clean and clear; a transparent lens or an undistorting mirror, through which, or in which, the empirical world could be discerned. The transcendentalists based their revolt on the claim that human experience was more than a mere reflection of secular objects, that in the soul, something of value was added to mere sensation, and the added value they called the divine, which, even while he paid lip service to it, Locke had denied, but for which the transcendentalists purported to find corroboration in otherwise inscrutable German philosophy. Obviously there was much that could not be made clear in words or sentences, and this they strove to express in the prose-poetry that was their rhetoric, in which Emerson excelled. * * * * *

Back

Next

Book Group Contents

Main Index